- Регистрация
- 17 Февраль 2018
- Сообщения
- 22 703
- Лучшие ответы
- 0
- Баллы
- 2 093
Offline
Enlarge / US Rep. Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-N.J.), right, speaks as House Commerce Committee Chair Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.) looks on during a hearing about TikTok on Thursday, March 23, 2023. (credit: Getty Images | Tom Williams )
A proposed repeal of Section 230 is designed to punish Big Tech but is also facing opposition from library associations, the Internet Archive, the owner of Wikipedia, and advocacy groups from across the political spectrum who say a repeal is bad for online speech. Opposition poured in before a House hearing today on the bipartisan plan to "sunset" Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which gives online platforms immunity from lawsuits over how they moderate user-submitted content.
Lawmakers defended the proposed repeal. House Commerce Committee Ranking Member Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-N.J.) today said that "Section 230 has outlived its usefulness and has played an outsized role in creating today's 'profits over people' Internet" and criticized what he called "Big Tech's constant scare tactics about reforming Section 230."
Pallone teamed up with Commerce Committee Chair Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.) to propose the Section 230 repeal. The lawmakers haven't come up with a replacement for the law, a tactic that some critics predict will lead to legislative chaos. A hearing memo said the draft bill "would sunset Section 230 of the Communications Act effective on December 31, 2025," but claimed the "intent of the legislation is not to have Section 230 actually sunset, but to encourage all technology companies to work with Congress to advance a long-term reform solution to Section 230."
Read 16 remaining paragraphs | Comments
